I don't usually like to post email messages that only say, "I agree." But, since I've been the bad guy here with some messages recently, let me just say that I agree one can, and should, have both speakup and emacspeak, if one wishes. As it happens, I do this myself. On Sun, 10 Mar 2002, Dave Hunt < wrote: > Hi, > > I have speakup and emacspeak both available on this computer, and am > glad of that. I'm using Emacspeak, now, with the sound card acting as > my synthesizer. One cannot do this, yet, with speakup. While setting > the Linux side of this machine up, I didn't have the sound card > working under Linux for quite a while. It was only with the help of > Speakup and this list that I was able to fix this. If you can have > both, do it! > > -Dave > > Anna Schneider writes: > > And this is in response to Evonne. > > > > Speak Up and Emacs Speak. Right now I'm going to try bot. Maybe I'll > > like one better than the other, though the whole synthesizer thing sounds > > messy. I'll have to think about that. Can either program run with the > > sound card only? And I'll go do reading on Emacs where you suggested. > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup > -- Janina Sajka, Director Technology Research and Development Governmental Relations Group American Foundation for the Blind (AFB) Email: janina at afb.net Phone: (202) 408-8175 Chair, Accessibility SIG Open Electronic Book Forum (OEBF) http://www.openebook.org
