On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Chris Peterson wrote: > This message is in html to filter out those who are to lazy to read it for how it is intended. Actually, you're an example of what we'd like to see more of. The package contents order in your message is: 1 ~40 lines Text/PLAIN 2 ~73 lines Text/HTML In other words, the text version came first, and displayed without a hitch. But, what do you mean "intended?" Do you mean you "intend" me to see certain fonts, and certain types of layout in your message? It ain't gonna happen, pal. This is not what goes down here--except perhaps for those on this list who look at mail with their eyes on their video monitors. If that's what you mean, your "intention" would be an insult here, and I would certainly resent it. I trust you don't mean that. > Obviously, writing a text-based browser that works well isn't a problem; > using text anymore except the blind community and all we ever do is > bitch when something doesn't work with our stuff. Actually, most power users I know of use text interfaces a lot. It's the only way to get much work done. But, I guess you don't know about that yet. > No wonder I can't stand blind people... Yourself included, I suppose??
