I have undergone background checks for working for the Internal Revenue Service and have a Sensitive Data Clearance. I've been duly fingerprinted and my credit records were scrutinized. When I was offered the job with my current employer, Verizon Communications, I underwent similar background checks and underwent drug testing. Personally, it's no skin off my butt! I don't have anything in my background that I am afraid for an employer to discover and I am thankful that as I work around many Foreign Nationals whose background I would not ever know, that they are probably not engaged in spying on an infrastructure which can expose lots and loss of information which is private and confidential down to grandma. I can see how it feels personally intrusive to have someone you know interrogated. But look at the other side of the coin. What if someone forged some of your checks how would you feel about that? It has happened to me when I was younger and less careful. I nailed the person but I was lucky. Unfortuneately handing over one's finances to someone else to potentially take advantage of is a matter which is what one can't be that trusting about. If a reader is disignated primarily to read certain information to you which isn't confidential or personal, as long as this person doesn't enter into your living space, then perhaps it doesn't matter. That's obviously one's preference and although I have personal concerns, if it isn't important to you, then at least you should be able to sign a waiver or something. In the situation of a State Agency providing personal services, I can see that they do want off the hook with respect to potential liabilities. I'm sure we've all heard or read about persons who are compromised being unjustly taken advantage of. I wouldn't let it stop me from utilizing those services provided it isn't a justification for denial of services merely because they are too lazy to expedite the procedure for obtainng sed services. Okay, I'm getting down from my soapbox! Amanda Lee On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, Kirk Wood wrote: > First, I will state up front that no job I have ever performed expected me > to pay for any kind of background check. Quite honestly, I can't think of > an instance in private sector where I would consider such a move. In fact, > one place had amended its rules to no longer expect applicants to pay for > failed drug screenings. Too many people refused to so it. That and too > many who failed never paid. I happened to apply while they were getting > new forms and they were providing a signed paper saying this would not be > expected. > > Of course it is your right to just accept such things. But personally, I > would not be so accepting. Then again, I am convinced that the NFB is not > your friend so wouldn't pay any attention to them. > > ======= > Kirk Wood > Cpt.Kirk at 1tree.net > > Nowlan's Theory: > He who hesitates is not only lost, but several miles from > the next freeway exit. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup >
