Hi: Excuse the off-topic reply, but I can't let an educational opportunity go by like this. On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Rich Caloggero wrote: > MIT and other private institutions are not covered by ADA > regulations (508 etc), at least this is my understanding. Can't comment on 508. But not covered by the ADA? Then who *IS* covered by it? Maybe I don't have a good handle on what the ADA is, but here in Australia, no-one is spared from our DDA legislation by vertue of who they are, and this is, IMHO, how it should be. someone care to enlighten me on this? Geoff..
