Right. No solution is perfect, but this one gets a lot of mileage. On Sat, 12 Jan 2002, Gregory Nowak wrote: > Grate sugestion, but it wouldn't work for everything. For example, something like "printf" begines with a lowercase p, and ends with a lowercase f, which would mean that it wouldn't get broken up if I understand your implementation of it. > Greg > > > On Sat, Jan 12, 2002 at 07:25:28AM -0500, Charles Hallenbeck wrote: > > Recent posts by Thomas Ward and others have prompted this > > suggestion for a speakup feature that might greatly facilitate > > things for people who deal with program code such as C or C++, > > and might make exception dictionaries less critical to implement. > > > > Many times the mixture of capitalization within an alphabetic > > string is unusual in program code, and of course it is important. > > I first ran across this many years ago with the name of the > > popular data base package "d base ii". Now what you should have > > heard inside the quotes is what everyone says when they pronounce > > it, but "d base" is actually written "dBASE", and I defy you to > > hear that correctly without spelling it out character by > > character. > > > > Here is my suggestion: When speakup is sending a series of > > letters to the synth and notices that (1) the current char is > > upper case, and (2) the last char sent was lower case, then (3) > > before sending the current char it should send whatever is needed > > to break the current string into two parts. Maybe that would be a > > CR, or a space, or some unspoken control char, or whatever. The > > result would be "d base" instead of "dBASE", and C programmers > > will recognize immediately that there will be zillions of similar > > funny case mixtures that will be spoken more correctly if the > > transition from lower to upper case within a string is broken up > > with a neutral unspoken element that serves only to cause the > > synth to pronounce what it has already received and treat the > > following as a new word. > > > > This would perhaps be an inexpensive speakup modification that > > would dramatically improve its performance for some of us. > > > > Chuck > > > > > > *<<<=-=>>>*<<<=-=>>>*<<<=-=>>>*<<<=-=>>>* > > Visit me at http://www.mhonline.net/~chuckh > > The Moon is Waning Crescent (1% of Full) > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Speakup mailing list > > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca > > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup > *<<<=-=>>>*<<<=-=>>>*<<<=-=>>>*<<<=-=>>>* Visit me at http://www.mhonline.net/~chuckh The Moon is Waning Crescent (1% of Full)
