trouble with CVS and a request for votes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Chuck,

If this is more of a problem with how a programmmer codes
their particular editor as opposed to how
speakup reads cursor movements, then I'll relent
and say 1.0.
Is there a particuar factor anyway that would
make speakup speak cursor movements in one editing enviornment, and not another?
Greg


On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 06:35:09AM -0400, Charles Hallenbeck wrote:
> Hi Greg
> 
> On Thu, 27 Sep 2001, Gregory Nowak wrote:
> 
> > Give me an example of a DOS screenreader
> > like that in an editor.
> 
> I can't help you on that one, but here is an interesting observation:
> 
> I am a pine user, and so I am relatively comfortable with pico editor.
> Pico tracks the cursor perfectly but it does not spontaneously read
> anything when the cursor moves. On the other hand, the pico look-alike
> 'nano' which also tracks the cursor perfectly, does spontaneously read
> each character as you move the cursor left or right.
> 
> The point is: Cursor tracking is not the problem. The problem is what gets
> spoken as the cursor is tracked, and on that score there3 are wide
> variations from one application to the next in a Linux environment.
> 
> I do not think it is helpful to look for DOS parallels.
> 
> Chuck
> 
> 
> 
> Visit me at http://www.mhonline.net/~chuckh
> "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
> safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup




[Index of Archives]     [Linux for the Blind]     [Fedora Discussioin]     [Linux Kernel]     [Yosemite News]     [Big List of Linux Books]
  Powered by Linux