On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Gregory Nowak wrote: > Only when all known bugs are totally iliminated, should speakup come out > as 1.0. I think that if you wish to use this system, then perhaps it is the thing to do would be to pull the cut and paste out and name it 1.0. If you have software that is constantly under revision and addition then you will never have a place where no problems ever exist. This is the very thing that Linus pointed out when they moved up to the 2.0 kernel. He said that yes,bugs still exist. But they will always exist. At least they are admitted. My suggestion would be to make 1.0 the curent one if the hooks remain in the kernel. Then when modularized synths become solid go on to 1.01 or something to signafy the difference. Going to a 1.0 version or higher will help make speakup an accepted part of the code base. And the marker that the hooks are in the kernel all the time seems like a logical reason to say that it has made the marker. ======= Kirk Wood Cpt.Kirk at 1tree.net "When I take action, I'm not going to fire a $2 million missle at a $10 empty tent and hit a camel in the butt. It's going to be decisive." - President George Bush
