Hi all, Ok, here's my opinion for what it's worth. Since the cursorring issue is not yet compleetly resolved, and since a few of us seem to be experiencing the system-freezing bug with the new cut and paste feature when trying to copy more then 1 line, I think speakup should stay as 0.11. Only when all known bugs are totally iliminated, should speakup come out as 1.0. Greg On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 08:18:05PM -0400, Kirk Reiser wrote: > Hi Adam: I'll try to answer your questions from both posts here. > >From what I understand brltty works very well with speakup. I don't > use it but Gene Collins and a number of other folks on the list do use > it. > > As far as cvs goes, the problem you are having is caused by your > friends isp not resloving a reverse lookup on his/her ip address. > When you connect to the cvs server it does a reverse lookup on the > address. It takes that returned host.domain name and then resolves it > forward. If it does not resolve then it assumes someone is doing ip > spoofing and refuses to talk any further. > > We have been discussing a new speakup release recently on the > reflector. If it looks like the speakup hooks are going to stay in > the kernel then we will create a new release. Cvs will then only work > with kernels newer than the release snap shot. If speakup does not > stay in the kernel then I would still like to get modularization of > the synth drivers in place before I make a new release. > > But! while we are on the subject of releases, we need to take a public > vote. Should the next release of speakup whenever it is released be > version 0.11 or as some folks are arguing 1.0? I'll put it to a vote > because it seems quite a few people have an opinion on the subject. > > Kirk > > -- > > Kirk Reiser The Computer Braille Facility > e-mail: kirk at braille.uwo.ca University of Western Ontario > phone: (519) 661-3061 > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
