On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 10:22 AM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > From: Thomas Gleixner tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Based on 1 normalized pattern(s): > > this is an extension to the linux operating system and is covered by > the same gnu general public license that covers the linux kernel > > extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier > > GPL-2.0-only > > has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 1 file(s). > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> I don't think this one is so clear, because, not knowing what was in this particular licensor's head, it isn't clear what "the same gnu general public license that covers the linux kernel" means even if one assumes the Linux kernel is covered specifically by GPLv2 only. I might be inclined to say GPL-2.0-only as the safest conclusion, but might be worth further thought. Richard
