Re: GPL + disclaimer variants

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 23 May 2019, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 10:39:47PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > 1) The simple one Richard pointed out today (Rule 80)
> > 
> >        This program is licensed "as is" without any warranty of any kind,
> >        whether express or implied.
> > 
> >    Files total:				592
> > 
> >    Files without Copyright notice:	 94	(needs git archaeology)
> > 
> >    Copyright holders:	   		177
> 
> how do you determine who is a copyright holder? Is it sufficient to look
> at those who added themselves to a copyright notice? Or may there be more
> copyright holders to a file than those listed in that notice -- and might
> they have contributed their work with that additional disclaimer as well?

Yes, that's a concern and that's why I proposed to keep the custom
disclaimers around and mark them accordingly.

See:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-spdx/alpine.DEB.2.21.1905201915150.1635@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Thanks,

	tglx



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux