On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 03:51:30PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Folks, > > I was waiting for the reference data to show up, but I fear I'm going to > wait another $N years. So lets start to get over with it. > > The current batch is against the top Linus tree as of today in the morning. > > I've updated the spdx-utils repo with the latest tools and pushed out the > latest automated run to the linux-spdx repository. > > The patches follow all the same pattern: > > 1) Each patch contains a single match rule. > > 2) The changelog of each patch contains the normalized match pattern(s). > The normalization is done by removing comment markers, line breaks, > whitespace damage, uppercase, punctuation, brackets, hyphens and such. > > If there is more than one pattern in the changelog, then the secondary > ones have items in square brackets inside. These are either caused by > copy and paste errors, file wide search/replace errors or randomly > placed copyright notices, .e.g. [no]_[pad]_[ctrl] which is in the file > NO_PAD_CTRL. > > The random words like NO_PAD_CTRL are removed when the boiler plate is > patched out. The copyright notices are kept intact of course. > > 3) The changelog contains also the concluded SPDX license identifier. > > 4) After the Signed-off-by line there is an URL to the actual patch in the > linux-spdx repository as some of the patches are trimmed due to mailing > list size limits. > > 5) The diffstat > > 6) The actual patch (maybe trimmed due to size limits) > > Please review the following: > > 1) Confirm that the concluded SPDX license identifier matches the > pattern(s) > > 2) Spot check the actual patches (if you're masochistic check all) > > In case of disagreement, please holler. If you're happy with the outcome, > please reply with a: 'Reviewed-by: Your Name <your@mail>'. > > You can reply with 'Reviewed-by' to individual mails or to this cover > letter. In both cases we can pick up the reviewed tags automatically. If > you find a problem in only one patch, then you still can give a Reviewed-by > to the cover letter if you reply to the failing patch with an appropriate > comment and state in the cover letter reply: > > 'For the series except patch N/25:' > 'Reviewed-by: Your Name <your@mail>' To let everyone know, I've queued this series up now and will forward them on to Linus in a bit after they pass some smoke-tests. thanks, greg k-h
