On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 11:04:12AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Mon, 20 May 2019, Greg KH wrote: > > On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 03:51:31PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > <snip> > > > > Commenting only on the first instance of this in the series: > > > > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx51-eukrea-cpuimx51.dtsi > > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx51-eukrea-cpuimx51.dtsi > > > @@ -1,19 +1,6 @@ > > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later > > > > I thought we were sticking with the "GPL-2.0+" string for this? > > > > I know we support both in the scripts and the license parsing, is it > > just a "up to the sender" as to what they prefer? > > I don't have a preference, but IMO sticking with the latest SPDX version is > probably the right thing to do. I did not make an intentional choice as > this is just what scancode exposes as concluded SPDX license identifier. Ok, fair enough, as long as we don't have to go and change all existing files to one or the other, I'm happy :) thanks, greg k-h
