On Mon, 20 May 2019, Greg KH wrote: > On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 03:51:31PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > <snip> > > Commenting only on the first instance of this in the series: > > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx51-eukrea-cpuimx51.dtsi > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx51-eukrea-cpuimx51.dtsi > > @@ -1,19 +1,6 @@ > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later > > I thought we were sticking with the "GPL-2.0+" string for this? > > I know we support both in the scripts and the license parsing, is it > just a "up to the sender" as to what they prefer? I don't have a preference, but IMO sticking with the latest SPDX version is probably the right thing to do. I did not make an intentional choice as this is just what scancode exposes as concluded SPDX license identifier. Thanks, tglx
