On Sun, 19 May 2019, Allison Randal wrote: > On 5/20/19 1:42 AM, Richard Fontana wrote: > > On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 8:27 PM Steve Winslow > > <swinslow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> For this one, the additional disclaimer paragraph at the bottom > >> (beginning with "THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY...") appears to come > >> from a BSD-style license, not GPL. I'm not sure this disclaimer should > >> be deleted and replaced by just a standard GPL-2.0-or-later tag. > > > > I am inclined to agree with Steve. It's materially different from the > > disclaimers in GPLv2 itself and could also indicate the remnants of an > > otherwise vanished BSD license notice. > > Would you be comfortable replacing the first three paragraphs of license > notice and disclaimer, which are clearly GPLv2 or later, and just > leaving the snowflake final paragraph disclaimer text in the file? > > There isn't enough of a BSD license here to make this clearly dual licensed. Let's skip that one for now. I talk to the author what the intention was with that. Thanks, tglx
