On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 4:56 PM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Kate, > > On Thu, 9 May 2019, Kate Stewart wrote: > > On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 9:11 AM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Any opinions on the size of the batches and how long it will take to get > > > the reviews done or any other suggestions for a workable solution? > > > > Grouping them in digestible sets, and organizing each patch around a > > pattern makes sense to me. +1 > > I appreciate the +1, but I would appreciate even more some hint what you > think is a digestible set size and how much time you think it takes to > review such a set. You know that this is just a question of time. Heh, fair enough. I meant I am fine with the proposal of 10-25 a day you outlined. Biasing more to the 25 side is ok - sooner we're through the bulk of them the better. :-) Thanks, Kate
