Re: [patch 0/4] SPDX: First batch of patches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 8 May 2019, Allison Randal wrote:
> On 5/8/19 9:23 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > 
> > Yes, the scripts produce logs and of course once the patch is applied you
> > can see from the diffstat which files are touched. So we have lots of ways
> > to figure out what has been changed and its preserved in the git history
> > forever.
> 
> Nod, but what I meant was the "wall of shame" file that the lawyers
> wanted, which preserved each variant license notice text and a list of
> the files that had it removed.
> 
> I thought the idea was horrible, and said so at the time, but they
> aren't wrong that the GPLv2 has a requirement to "keep intact all the
> notices that refer to this License". None of us managed to come up with
> a better alternative than moving the notices into a doc file, with some
> introductory text to say "please never do this again, just use SPDX
> headers".
> 
> Though, maybe it would be better if I said nothing and allowed the whole
> idea to be forgotten...

Ahhh that one. That's an easy to do add on if people insist ....




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux