Re: [PATCH] no needs to use MARK_CURRENT_DELETED() for multi-jumps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 17/04/2021 17:38, Luc Van Oostenryck wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 17, 2021 at 05:18:31PM +0100, Ramsay Jones wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 17, 2021 at 03:31:54PM +0200, Luc Van Oostenryck wrote:
>>> MARK_CURRENT_DELETED() was added for the case(s) where an element
>>> must be removed from the list but the address of the other elements
>>> must not be changed. In this case of effectively removing the
>>> element from it list, the element is 'marked' as deleted in the list
>>> and the list walking macros will later take this in account.
>>>
>>> However, this is not never needed for multi-jumps.
>>
>> s/not never/not ever/ ?
> 
> Hehe :) Thanks.
> Just 's/not never/never/'

Heh, palmface, of course! ;-)

ATB,
Ramsay Jones





[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux