Re: [PATCH] no needs to use MARK_CURRENT_DELETED() for multi-jumps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Apr 17, 2021 at 05:18:31PM +0100, Ramsay Jones wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 17, 2021 at 03:31:54PM +0200, Luc Van Oostenryck wrote:
> > MARK_CURRENT_DELETED() was added for the case(s) where an element
> > must be removed from the list but the address of the other elements
> > must not be changed. In this case of effectively removing the
> > element from it list, the element is 'marked' as deleted in the list
> > and the list walking macros will later take this in account.
> > 
> > However, this is not never needed for multi-jumps.
> 
> s/not never/not ever/ ?

Hehe :) Thanks.
Just 's/not never/never/'

-- Luc



[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux