Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] predefined macros for intmax_t/intptr_t/...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 09:17:56PM +0000, Ramsay Jones wrote:
> On 17/12/2018 20:45, Luc Van Oostenryck wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 06:08:28PM +0000, Ramsay Jones wrote:
> 
> >> I will try to get to this testing soon. (but I would not be unhappy
> >> if you pushed this out, as it stands, and go 'incremental' with any
> >> additional 'fixes'). :-D
> > 
> > Yes, it's was essentially my intention and why I only posted a delta
> > for -v4.
> 
> Great! BTW, I noticed a typo in one commit message for patch titled
> 'add predefined macros for [u]int32_t', namely s/[u]loing/[u]long/.
> Also, in the patch titled 'fix the size of long double', I think
> that you meant s/The odd on here/The odd one here/?

Yup. Thanks.
I've pushed it now.

--Luc



[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux