On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 01:13:36AM +0100, Luc Van Oostenryck wrote:
> I possible, we reuse for sparse the same option names than for
> GCC and here this new -Wnon-ansi-function-declaration option
> more or less covers GCC's -Wold-style-definition and
> -Wstrict-protoypes.
Understood, that makes sense. Your patches look good to me.
On a related note, one problem we have is that we have some legacy code
like:
int foo(a, b)
int a;
{
if (b)
return a;
}
sparse quite right complains about not having any clue as to what "b"
is. At the moment I just have it turned off for such code, as it's
thankfully a minority.
thanks
john
