Re: [PATCH 6/9] pre-process: print variable argument macros correctly

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 21/11/2018 00:12, Luc Van Oostenryck wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 01:06:23AM +0100, Luc Van Oostenryck wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 08:51:33PM +0000, Ramsay Jones wrote:
>>>
>>> The dump_macros() function fails to correctly output the definition of
>>> macros that have a variable argument list. For example, the following
>>> macros:
>>>
>>>     #define unlocks(...) annotate(unlock_func(__VA_ARGS__))
>>>     #define apply(x,...) x(__VA_ARGS__)
>>>
>>> are output like so:
>>>
>>>     #define unlocks(__VA_ARGS__) annotate(unlock_func(__VA_ARGS__))
>>>     #define apply(x,__VA_ARGS__) x(__VA_ARGS__)
>>>
>>> Add the code necessary to print the ellipsis in the argument list to the
>>> dump_macros() function and add the above macros to the 'dump-macros.c'
>>> test file.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>  pre-process.c                         | 11 ++++++++++-
>>>  validation/preprocessor/dump-macros.c |  5 +++++
>>>  2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/pre-process.c b/pre-process.c
>>> index 7b76c65..418b8ee 100644
>>> --- a/pre-process.c
>>> +++ b/pre-process.c
>>> @@ -2167,6 +2167,12 @@ struct token * preprocess(struct token *token)
>>>  	return token;
>>>  }
>>>  
>>> +static int is_VA_ARGS_token(struct token *token)
>>> +{
>>> +	return (token_type(token) == TOKEN_IDENT) &&
>>> +		(token->ident == &__VA_ARGS___ident);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>  static void dump_macro(struct symbol *sym)
>>>  {
>>>  	int nargs = sym->arglist ? sym->arglist->count.normal : 0;
>>> @@ -2182,7 +2188,10 @@ static void dump_macro(struct symbol *sym)
>>>  		for (; !eof_token(token); token = token->next) {
>>>  			if (token_type(token) == TOKEN_ARG_COUNT)
>>>  				continue;
>>> -			printf("%s%s", sep, show_token(token));
>>> +			if (is_VA_ARGS_token(token))
>>> +				printf("%s...", sep);
>>> +			else
>>> +				printf("%s%s", sep, show_token(token));
>>
>> I'm wondering what is displayed by:
>> 	show_ident(&__VA_ARGS___ident);
>>
>> I would much prefer to adjust show_ident()/show_token() and keep
>> the code here generic.
> 
> Mmmm, I looked at this one and what you've done here is the best.
> I don't understand exactly why but for arguments the token
> SPECIAL_ELLIPSIS is, at some stage, changed into a VA_ARGS ident.

Heh, I'm having a weird flashback! I don't quite remember the details,
but I was convinced the parse_arguments() (pre-process.c #1087) function
was wrong, but I got lost several times in the debugger, so gave up!

I thought a normal return would come from the condition at line 1123,
which would leave the SPECIAL_ELLIPSIS token alone, rather than from
the conditional at line 1143, which replaces it with VA_ARGS. ;-)

> This need then to be reversed when dumping the macros.

It is possible that SPECIAL_ELLIPSIS is not _always_ replaced with
VA_ARGS, and the above should still work. However, I may have given up
too easily. :)

ATB,
Ramsay Jones




[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux