On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 12:36:38AM +0000, Ramsay Jones wrote: > > > On 19/11/2018 23:59, Luc Van Oostenryck wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 08:44:37PM +0000, Ramsay Jones wrote: > >> > >> Some brief notes about the patches: > >> > >> 0001-sparsec-use-a-compatible-exception-model-on-cygwin.patch > >> 0002-sparsei-add-the-no-jit-options.patch > >> > >> The first two patches fix the use of the llvm tools on cygwin. The test > >> suite had 64 test failures (55 + additional 9 fixed by these patches). > >> The test suite now runs clean. > > > > I'm not sure to understand what's the difference between the 55 and > > the 9 additional ones. > > When these patches were written, only 3 'additional test failures' > were caused by the problems addressed by these patches (backend tests). > Since then, many more backend tests have been written: > > $ make check > Makefile:124: Your system does not have libxml, disabling c2xml > Makefile:146: Your system does not have gtk3/gtk2, disabling test-inspect > TEST __func__ (__func__.c) > TEST abi-integer (abi-integer.c) > ... > > TEST warn-unknown-attribute-yes (Wunknown-attribute-yes.c) > KO: out of 608 tests, 544 passed, 64 failed > 55 of them are known to fail > make: *** [Makefile:228: check] Error 1 > $ > > So, the 55 are those marked 'known to fail' the 9 (64 - 55) other > test failures are fixed by these patches. Ah yes, OK. Thanks, -- Luc