Re: [PATCH v10 08/22] kasan, arm64: untag address in __kimg_to_phys and _virt_addr_is_linear

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 8:23 PM, Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 5:52 PM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>  /*
>>> @@ -232,7 +241,7 @@ static inline unsigned long kaslr_offset(void)
>>>  #define __is_lm_address(addr)        (!!((addr) & BIT(VA_BITS - 1)))
>>>
>>>  #define __lm_to_phys(addr)   (((addr) & ~PAGE_OFFSET) + PHYS_OFFSET)
>>> -#define __kimg_to_phys(addr) ((addr) - kimage_voffset)
>>> +#define __kimg_to_phys(addr) (KASAN_RESET_TAG(addr) - kimage_voffset)
>>
>> IIUC You need to adjust __lm_to_phys() too, since that could be passed
>> an address from SLAB.
>>
>> Maybe that's done in a later patch, but if so it's confusing to split it
>> out that way. It would be nicer to fix all the *_to_*() helpers in one
>> go.
>
> __lm_to_phys() does & ~PAGE_OFFSET, so it resets the tag by itself. I
> can add an explicit __tag_reset() if you think it makes sense.

Hi Mark,

I think I've addressed all of your comments except for this one. Do
you think it makes sense to add explicit __tag_reset() calls to
__lm_to_phys() and a few other macros, that already set the tag to 0
by doing & ~PAGE_OFFSET?

Thanks!



[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux