On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 01:27:29AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 8:28 PM Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 10:04:46PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 3:09 AM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sun, 28 Oct 2018 13:09:42 +0000 > > > > Changbin Du <changbin.du@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > The level4_kernel_pgt is only defined when X86_5LEVEL is enabled. > > > > > So declare check_la57_support() as inline to make sure the code > > > > > referring to level4_kernel_pgt is optimized out. This is a preparation > > > > > for CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_DEBUGGING. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > -- Steve > > > > > > > > > > Applied to linux-kbuild. > > > > Next time, before you route a patch through your tree, please get an x86 > > maintainer's ACK first. > > > I changed my mind, and did not include this in my previous pull request > because this series is causing many warnings. > Most of the new warnings are false warnings. Since this series didn't change any code where the warnings happen. I'll make patches to make gcc happy. > Now, it is aiming for v5.0-rc1 > > So, it is not too late. > > If x86 maintainers issue Acked-by, > I am happy to add it. > > > > > > Thx. > > > > -- > > Regards/Gruss, > > Boris. > > > > Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply. > > > > -- > Best Regards > Masahiro Yamada -- Thanks, Changbin Du
