Re: [PATCH v1 00/18] SSA conversion, the classical way

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 25 March 2018 at 22:43, Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 20 March 2018 at 21:52, Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 20 March 2018 at 21:49, Luc Van Oostenryck
>> <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 09:07:47PM +0000, Dibyendu Majumdar wrote:
>>>> On 20 March 2018 at 00:52, Luc Van Oostenryck
>>>> <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> > This series replace the current SSA conversion by one using
>>>> > the 'classical' way, via the iterated dominance frontier.
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for posting this patch series. I would like to test it. I
>>>> will apply my LLVM fixes against your tree so that I can run the set
>>>> of tests I have prepared. This will take a bit of time but I will
>>>> report back here on results.
>>>
>
> I have done some initial work on this. My changes are in:
> https://github.com/dibyendumajumdar/sparse-dev/commits/ssa-v1. Some
> more work is needed as this is still preliminary.
>
> So far 65 out of 85 tests in
> (https://github.com/dibyendumajumdar/sparse-testing) pass. I haven't
> yet investigated the failures - they could be due to issues in my
> merge.
>

Improved to 70 out of 85 after removing the store instruction for
initializing aggregates.

Regards
Dibyendu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux