Re: [PATCH v1 00/18] SSA conversion, the classical way

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 09:07:47PM +0000, Dibyendu Majumdar wrote:
> Hi Luc,
> 
> On 20 March 2018 at 00:52, Luc Van Oostenryck
> <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > This series replace the current SSA conversion by one using
> > the 'classical' way, via the iterated dominance frontier.
> >
> 
> Thank you for posting this patch series. I would like to test it. I
> will apply my LLVM fixes against your tree so that I can run the set
> of tests I have prepared. This will take a bit of time but I will
> report back here on results.

Sure. Thank you.
I must warn you of two things though:
- most series I posted the last months and especially the last
  two weeks are somehow needed to use and test this one.
- don't forget that for the reasons explained in the cover letter
  (and a few others, less important), the SSA is still not correct
  or at least is broken during simplify_loads() and branch rewritting.

So, to stay 100% meaningful, you should drop all optimizations after
ssa_convert() and insure that you don't have unreachable code in your
input files.
 
-- Luc
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux