On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 2:14 AM, Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 6:59 AM, Luc Van Oostenryck > <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 01:29:08AM +0800, Christopher Li wrote: >> >> If you would do that: >> 1) it would be equivalent to rebasing one of my branches >> 2) it make me wonder if I have misunderstood something to the way >> we had, some months ago, agreed to work together. > > Just asking. Because you start to send patches like the build > series I don't intend to apply. I need to know it fall into the same > category. > >> 3) it make me wonder why there is 67 branches in my github >> tree waiting for you to pull them, most having been totally >> ignored by you, a good number of them being 7 or 8 months old >> with a few even older (not talking about the dozens of other >> topic branches that I've never bothered to submit because they >> don't make sense without their parent branches). > > Hey, I assume you mean the llvm fix series. The LLVM fixes series and the 66 others series. > We have agreement that will resume the pull again after the 5.0.1. > Which means right now. Chris ... v0.5.1 was out mid-August (and you made a very long and painful thing of it). You ignored the last pull request for 7 weeks. > That series I just send out one important > feed back about the OP_PUSH. I thought I have send that one out > but I just find out it haven't. That is my bad. Is that serious? Given how you have been so good the last 2-3 years at ignoring patches & series, must I, once more, trust you and believe this? -- Luc -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
