On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 6:59 AM, Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 01:29:08AM +0800, Christopher Li wrote: > > If you would do that: > 1) it would be equivalent to rebasing one of my branches > 2) it make me wonder if I have misunderstood something to the way > we had, some months ago, agreed to work together. Just asking. Because you start to send patches like the build series I don't intend to apply. I need to know it fall into the same category. > 3) it make me wonder why there is 67 branches in my github > tree waiting for you to pull them, most having been totally > ignored by you, a good number of them being 7 or 8 months old > with a few even older (not talking about the dozens of other > topic branches that I've never bothered to submit because they > don't make sense without their parent branches). Hey, I assume you mean the llvm fix series. We have agreement that will resume the pull again after the 5.0.1. Which means right now. That series I just send out one important feed back about the OP_PUSH. I thought I have send that one out but I just find out it haven't. That is my bad. Once we finalize a solution for that, that series is pull-able. Please response to that email. > 4) it make me wonder why this sudden promptitude from your part. > I am confused and need some clarification as well. Chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
