On 11/06/2017 09:28 AM, Luc Van Oostenryck wrote: > On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hello Luc, >> >> On 11/05/2017 05:25 PM, Luc Van Oostenryck wrote: >>> @@ -175,10 +168,12 @@ ldflags += $($(@)_LDFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) >>> ldlibs += $($(@)_LDLIBS) $(LDLIBS) >>> $(foreach p,$(PROGRAMS),$(eval $(p): $($(p)_OBJS))) >>> $(PROGRAMS): % : %.o $(LIBS) >>> - $(QUIET_LINK)$(LD) $(ldflags) $^ $(ldlibs) -o $@ >>> + @echo " LD $@" >>> + $(Q)$(LD) $(ldflags) $^ $(ldlibs) -o $@ >> >> Is it intended that you introduce changed behaviour here? Now you get >> the pretty printed output when building with V=1. > > It was not the intention as such but, yes, I knew the behaviour changed. > I don't think the new behaviour is a problem, on the contrary, but if it is > a problem it can be changed back. I don't consider it problematic, the added benefit is that it becomes easier to relate a V=1 build with a V=0 build. But IMHO this should not be sold as "simpler logic" without any further comment. Best regards Uwe
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
