On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hello Luc, > > On 11/05/2017 05:25 PM, Luc Van Oostenryck wrote: >> @@ -175,10 +168,12 @@ ldflags += $($(@)_LDFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) >> ldlibs += $($(@)_LDLIBS) $(LDLIBS) >> $(foreach p,$(PROGRAMS),$(eval $(p): $($(p)_OBJS))) >> $(PROGRAMS): % : %.o $(LIBS) >> - $(QUIET_LINK)$(LD) $(ldflags) $^ $(ldlibs) -o $@ >> + @echo " LD $@" >> + $(Q)$(LD) $(ldflags) $^ $(ldlibs) -o $@ > > Is it intended that you introduce changed behaviour here? Now you get > the pretty printed output when building with V=1. It was not the intention as such but, yes, I knew the behaviour changed. I don't think the new behaviour is a problem, on the contrary, but if it is a problem it can be changed back. -- Luc -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
