On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 11:26 PM, Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I think if you want bb->needs and bb->define to zero. > Best directly assign bb->needs && bb->defines to zero; > > I am not sure C stander how to deal with the unused bit field > parts. If I recall correctly a lot of bit-field related stuff are implementation > define. So setting bb->sealed and bb->unsealable might not be enough > to make bb->needs zero. You're right. I'm planning to move them away anyway with .nr & a new field. -- Luc -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
