Re: [PATCH 06/29] topasm: top-level asm is special

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 8:49 AM, Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> +       if (!sym->ident) {      // top-level asm
>
> Maybe here we should check the statement is really top-level asm?
> Later on we might have more than top-level asm as with sym->ident == NULL.

Sure but it's currently how they must be detected.

In fact (like the name may suggest) this patch is part of a series
that better deal with top-level asm (they are not really statement!').
For example, top-level asm must be parsed as basic asm and not
extended asm.

So yes, I totally agree, but not now.

-- Luc
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux