Re: [RFC] sparse SSA construction

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Luc,

On 15 August 2017 at 21:14, Luc Van Oostenryck
<luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It's just too bad that the paper simply ignores gotos. The method
> is really cool, fast, simple and clean, I love it. But I had to add
> a few things, more akin to kludges than hacks IMO, to make it
> work with gotos. But as is, it works pretty well, is fast and produce
> correct SSA (also avoid few quadratic behaviours the current
> simplify_one_symbol() has).
>

I am trying to understand above - why should there be a special
treatment for gotos? A goto is simply a 'br' instruction from one BB
to another, so is there something special about it?

Regards
Dibyendu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux