Hi Chris, On 14 August 2017 at 15:05, Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 3:28 AM, Dibyendu Majumdar > <mobile@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> lua_settop: >> .L0: >> <entry-point> >> setge.32 %r2 <- %arg2, $0 >> cbr %r2, .L6, .L2 >> >> .L6: >> load.64 %r5 <- 0[VOID] >> load.64 %r7 <- 8[VOID] <=========== > > Thanks for the report. > > So you mean here the arg1 has been optimized to void. > > I am able to duplicate this problem with rc5. That is strange as the output is from test-linearize from rc5. > Haven't have time to dig deeper. But it seems before > the optimization, the first round of linearization > has the output that arg1 was still there. > > Regard to this release. I don't think we have time to > make all the IR correct for RC5. > > I suggest we make the 0.5.1 release this week. > > Then immediate start to work on 0.5.2, make the > necessary fix there, then we can have RC1 for 0.5.2. > Yes I agree that there is no need to hold the release up as most likely this is an existing issue. Regards Dibyendu -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
