Re: [PATCH v4 00/25] improve constexpr handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 9:44 PM, Luc Van Oostenryck
<luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Here is a respin of the series originally made and
> submitted by Nicolai Stange.
>
> The goal of this series is to improve the tracking of
> expression constness in the sense of C99 [6.4.4, 6.6]:
> more fine-grained and more correct. A new flag is added
> for a strict mode while by default offering the relaxed
> mode we're used to, for example for kernel compile.

Sorry for the late replay. As I express before, this integer context
will not be part of this release 0.5.1.

Now the RC5 is almost out of the door. I can catch up a bit of
back log I have.

One suggest on the V4 is that, (suggestion, not reason to object
the inclusion of this series. If you prefer, I can merge them as it is
and change them later.)

I would like the manipulate of the bits representation abstract as
higher level function or macros. I have suspicious that bits
representation can be simplify in the future. Wrap them into
higher level function at the call site will be easier to read what
is the intend for this operation.

It also make the change of the underlying bit representation easier,
that is if we do found a simpler representation.

Thanks

Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux