On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 10:34 PM, Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Of course. I will hold the RC5 for you. I haven't push the change to > master yet. It is only in sparse-next, I can still roll back the change in we > wants to. > > Can you show me some C input file that your original patch will do the > right thing and current one will miss the opportunity to simplify? > Even for the case it is just a suspect of producing worse code is fine. > Just point me to some test case, I will investigate and compare the > results. Ping. I am still waiting for your test source to compare the two approach of kill_unreachable_bb(). If both generate the equivalent result, I prefer the simpler approach. I will hold the RC5 until Wednesday if I don't have additional input. Thanks Chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
