On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 6:39 AM, Luc Van Oostenryck
<luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> - if (__head) { \
> - do { int __nr; \
> - for (__nr = 0; __nr < __list->nr; __nr++) { \
> - do { \
> - ptr = PTR_ENTRY(__list,__nr); \
> - do {
> + if (!__head) break; \
> + do { int __nr; \
> + for (__nr = 0; __nr < __list->nr; __nr++) { \
> + ptr = PTR_ENTRY(__list,__nr); \
>
> #define DO_END_FOR_EACH(ptr, __head, __list, __nr) \
> - } while (0); \
> - } while (0); \
> - } \
> - } while ((__list = __list->next) != __head); \
> - } \
> + } \
> + } while ((__list = __list->next) != __head); \
> } while (0)
I think the extra "do {} while (0)" is there to prevent the FOR_EACH
paring with END_FOR_EACH_REVERSE() and vise versa.
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
