Re: [PATCH] dissect: use built_in_ident() instead of MK_IDENT()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 11:35:30PM +0100, Ramsay Jones wrote:
> On 19/06/17 22:14, Luc Van Oostenryck wrote:
> > The motivation for this patch was to allow sparse to be
> > compiled with clang which doesn't like what is done
> > on VLAs in the MK_IDENT() macro.
> > 
> > But also, I can't see any justification for not using the
> > real thing to create identifiers: built_in_ident().
> > 
> > CC: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  dissect.h      | 13 -------------
> >  test-dissect.c |  6 +++---
> >  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/dissect.h b/dissect.h
> > index 3b72b8988..5ac1f4d40 100644
> > --- a/dissect.h
> > +++ b/dissect.h
> > @@ -25,16 +25,3 @@ struct reporter
> >  };
> >  
> >  extern void dissect(struct symbol_list *, struct reporter *);
> > -
> > -#define	MK_IDENT(s)	({				\
> > -	static struct {					\
> > -		struct ident ident;			\
> > -		char __[sizeof(s)];			\
> > -	} ident = {{					\
> > -		.len  = sizeof(s)-1,			\
> > -		.name = s,				\
> > -	}};						\
> > -	&ident.ident;					\
> > -})
> > -
> > -#endif
> 
> Hmm, does this compile?; you seem to have removed an #endif,
> leaving an unbalanced '#ifndef DISSECT_H'.

Yes, something (or more probably someone (me)) eat it.
It's already corrected.

But thanks again!

-- Luc 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux