On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 11:01:15PM +0100, Dibyendu Majumdar wrote: > Hi, > > I was looking at the output of c2xml (actually modified version used > in dmrC project) - and saw that typedefs are not marked in any way. > Digging deeper I found that typedef symbols do not have the > MOD_TYPEDEF set. MOD_USERTYPE is set though. > > Is there any harm in setting MOD_TYPEDEF also? Yes, MOD_TYPEDEF is not used and MOD_USERTYPE is used to 'mark' typedefs. I've a patch to tidy up this as well as other cleanups of the MOD_XXXs. It will be part of the first batch of patches after the release. -- Luc -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
