On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > I was looking at the output of c2xml (actually modified version used > in dmrC project) - and saw that typedefs are not marked in any way. > Digging deeper I found that typedef symbols do not have the > MOD_TYPEDEF set. MOD_USERTYPE is set though. > > Is there any harm in setting MOD_TYPEDEF also? I take a look, nobody is actually using MOD_TYPEDEF any more. It was used in the old code for parsing typedef types. Of course there is no harm setting it, it might make more sense to remove it. Chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
