Re: sparse-llvm issue with handling of phisrc instruction

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 06:17:50PM +0000, Dibyendu Majumdar wrote:
> Hi Luc,
> 
> On 22 March 2017 at 18:15, Luc Van Oostenryck
> <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>> I am trying to see if sparse-llvm can handle unsimplified IR output
> >>>> from linearizer. I think there is a problem in how it handles phisrc.
> >>>
> >>> Does your non-simplified sparse IR contain the liveness information?
> >>> I think those are needed for the handling of OP_PHI & OP_PHISOURCE
> >>> in sparse-llvm.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Probably not - I commented out everything in linearize_fn() from
> >> simplify_symbol_usage() and downwards. Please tell me if this is
> >> incorrect.
> >
> > As far as I understand, sparse-llvm needs track_pseudo_liveness().
> >
> 
> Tried that - it made no difference.

I'm not sure liveness info has much sense without simplification,
at least part of it.

-- Luc
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux