Re: sparse-llvm issue with handling of phisrc instruction

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Luc,

On 22 March 2017 at 18:17, Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> I am trying to see if sparse-llvm can handle unsimplified IR output
>>>>> from linearizer. I think there is a problem in how it handles phisrc.
>>>>
>>>> Does your non-simplified sparse IR contain the liveness information?
>>>> I think those are needed for the handling of OP_PHI & OP_PHISOURCE
>>>> in sparse-llvm.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Probably not - I commented out everything in linearize_fn() from
>>> simplify_symbol_usage() and downwards. Please tell me if this is
>>> incorrect.
>>
>> As far as I understand, sparse-llvm needs track_pseudo_liveness().
>>
>
> Tried that - it made no difference.
>

If there is a single phisrc and phi instruction then is phisrc meant
to have the phi in its user list?

I am trying out a different way of handling phisrc - I will let you
know if it works.

Regards
Dibyendu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux