Re: sparse-llvm incorrect definition of local variables

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9 March 2017 at 14:35, Luc Van Oostenryck
<luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 01:50:16AM +0000, Dibyendu Majumdar wrote:
>>
>> I think by combining the symbol's identifier and address a unique
>> reference can be created - thus whenever we encounter a symbol that is
>> not extern or toplevel we should create a local object using the
>> symbol's name + address as the LLVM identifier.
>
> That's more or less the idea, of course.
> And you need to consider all objects that you don't need to
> allocate because they are always in a (pseudo-) register.
>

Ok thank you. I will try to implement a fix and get back when I have
something that works or if I get stuck.

Regards
Dibyendu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux