Re: sparse-llvm incorrect definition of local variables

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 01:50:16AM +0000, Dibyendu Majumdar wrote:
> 
> I think by combining the symbol's identifier and address a unique
> reference can be created - thus whenever we encounter a symbol that is
> not extern or toplevel we should create a local object using the
> symbol's name + address as the LLVM identifier.

That's more or less the idea, of course.
And you need to consider all objects that you don't need to
allocate because they are always in a (pseudo-) register.

-- Luc 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux