On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 10:56:02AM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote: > According to Peter Zijlstra, irq_common_data::state_use_accessors is not > designed for public use. Therefore make it private so that people who > write code accessing it directly will get blamed by sparse. > > Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > include/linux/irq.h | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/irq.h b/include/linux/irq.h > index 3c1c967..0b8f273 100644 > --- a/include/linux/irq.h > +++ b/include/linux/irq.h > @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ struct irq_domain; > * @msi_desc: MSI descriptor > */ > struct irq_common_data { > - unsigned int state_use_accessors; > + unsigned int __private state_use_accessors; > #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA > unsigned int node; > #endif > @@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ enum { > IRQD_FORWARDED_TO_VCPU = (1 << 20), > }; > > -#define __irqd_to_state(d) ((d)->common->state_use_accessors) > +#define __irqd_to_state(d) ACCESS_PRIVATE((d)->common, state_use_accessors) > > static inline bool irqd_is_setaffinity_pending(struct irq_data *d) > { We should probably #undef that one once we're done with it.. Thomas? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html