On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 4:09 AM, Tony Camuso <tcamuso@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I've since submitted a runtime patch (3/3 V3) with a switch as a
> response to this patch, but it basically does the same thing here.
>
> Consider the case where the source contains something like this...
>
> struct foo {
> union {
> int number;
> int *pointer;
> };
> };
>
> There being no ident for the union within the struct, we get the warning,
> "missing identifier in declaration" etc.
>
I can't reproduce the warning with the chrisl repo master branch.
That being said, if there is indeed a bug in sparse, it should be a
separate patch. It changes the parsing behavior.
Thanks
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
