On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I see. Thanks for the review. So the above case should not raise > error. However, the following one should: > > static __pure void *(*f3_err) = non_pure_func; > > I got it the other way around. I will add that to the test case > and send out the second round review. I send push out the v2 version of the test case at https://git.kernel.org/cgit/devel/sparse/chrisl/sparse.git/log/?h=review-pure-attr2 I haven't include the fix part yet. Do you see any thing wrong with the test case? Thanks Chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
