Hi Chris, I noticed, this afternoon, that you have pushed new patches to your public repo on kernel.org (including most of the patches from my 'misc sparse patches' series). After a quick test, I noticed a few minor problems (see first two patches). I don't know how you like to manage your public repo, but if you don't mind re-winding your master branch, then you could squash patch #1 into commit e23abfd and patch #2 into fe57afa. The third patch is actually a re-send of one I sent separately after the 10 patch series. The final patch is a possible alternative to "[PATCH 04/10] compile-i386.c: don't mix calls to write(2) with stdio", which basically just removes the compile program. If you prefer another solution, just let me know. [Note: I have been living with the RFC patch #10 for quite a while now with no problems. However, it was just a quick hack to speed up cgcc/sparse on Cygwin and, on reflection, not a good reason to introduce a sparse configuration file! Also, the use of the perl language for the config file can be viewed as a bit cute (too cute for some people). I will probably keep it as a locally applied patch on cygwin (it is a noticeable speedup on cygwin), but remove it on Linux.] Ramsay Jones (4): test-suite: remove bashism to avoid test failures cgcc: avoid passing a sparse-only option to cc parse.c: remove duplicate 'may_alias' ignored_attributes compile: remove the unmaintained compile program .gitignore | 1 - Makefile | 4 +- cgcc | 4 +- compile-i386.c | 2407 ------------------------------------------------- compile.c | 84 -- compile.h | 10 - parse.c | 2 - validation/test-suite | 2 +- 8 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2510 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 compile-i386.c delete mode 100644 compile.c delete mode 100644 compile.h -- 2.1.0 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html