On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 05:06:27PM +0000, Rustad, Mark D wrote:
> The problem is that the kernel include files throw so many warnings
> that it really discourages anyone from ever going through them, even
> for a single driver. The warnings are far more valuable and usable
> when known acceptable usages are silenced.
You can always do one file only, for example:
make W=2 arch/x86/kernel/msr.o > w.log 2>&1
> Well, the whole series of patches that I made definitely went too far
> - only the first 5 out of about 30 have been posted, but if we can
> make some progress on generating fewer warnings out of the include
> files, I think it would be helpful.
Helpful for what? Those are W=2 warnings which are disabled in the
default build.
> Already the patches that use them have triggered some activity that
> has resulted in resolving warnings without use of the macros, and I
> see that as much better than simply using the macros.
>
> The macros can serve a useful purpose, but they should not be widely
> used. When to use them is definitely a judgement call. If the macros
> are accepted, it may be worth adding a checkpatch.pl warning for
> adding a DIAG_*IGNORE macro.
Right, so add the macros and tell people *not* to use them. That won't
fly.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
