On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Mike Holmes <mike.holmes@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi > > I wondered if the following sparse error indication was expected > behaviour or if it is a bug, > I would not expect sparse to error with "got 9" > > > $ cat static.c > #include <stdio.h> > > #define fake 9 > _Static_assert( fake > 8, "test message"); _Static_assert is a C11 thing? The current sparse know nothing about _Static_assert(). So it treat it as a function declare. Patch are welcome if any one want to give it a try. Chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
